History

Killing Jesus: Prologue

Torture. Infanticide. Brutality. Murder.

The world would never be the same.

“The execution of Jesus was a crime born of the streets, the barracks, the enclaves of the privileged, and the smoke-filled back rooms of religious and political power brokers. Its meaning lives in these places still.”

It is the most fiercely debated murder of all time. Its symbol is worn by billions of people worldwide. Its spiritual meaning is invoked daily in time-honored rituals. In Killing Jesus, New York Times best-selling author Stephen Mansfield masterfully recounts the corrupt trial and grisly execution of Jesus more than two thousand years ago.

Approaching the story at its most human level, Mansfield uses both secular sources and biblical accounts to bring fresh perspective to the human drama, political intrigue, and criminal network behind the killing of the world’s most famous man.

Killing Jesus by Stephen Mansfield hits bookshelves nationwide on Tuesday, May 7 2013.

Visit the website at www.killingjesus.com

Video Produced by Worthy Publishing

Play

The Truth of Lincoln’s Assassination

This week marks the anniversary of Abraham Lincoln’s assassination. Stephen lays out the historical validity of what his book, Lincoln’s Battle With God, says about Lincoln’s last words.

Related Articles

Photo Gallery: http://www.history.com/photos/abraham-lincoln/photo1#

The Co-Conspirators: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/
biography/assassination-co-conspirators/

Lincoln’s Battle With God by Stephen Mansfield http://www.lincolnsbattlewithgod.com

Play

Did Jesus Exist?

Just before Easter, I was interviewed on several national talk shows about by upcoming book (go to “Recent Media” to view). Of all that I said on the air, what prompted the most email was my statement that there is evidence from outside the Bible both for the fact that Jesus lived and for the fact that he lived when the Bible indicates he lived. It never crossed my mind that this was controversial until a friend explained that it is now widely accepted, particularly on university campuses, that the whole story of Jesus might be contrived and that, therefore, Christianity is a myth.

My new book, Killing Jesus, is not about apologetics. It is, though, about the historical underpinnings of the execution of Jesus and this is why I decided to include an extensive section of notes, some of which have to do with confirmation of the Jesus story from outside of the Bible. Let me quote a bit from those notes here to answer a few of the questions I received.

I should say first that the gospels themselves are sufficient evidence of the life of Jesus. There are many fine scholarly works that confirm this. I’m happy to accept the challenge of providing evidence from outside of scripture but I do not want this willingness to be construed as agreement that the New Testament is not alone a credible historical document. It is, but I certainly agree—even with Christianity’s critics—that if the faith arose as the New Testament claims, there ought to be external evidence.

I’ll provide just a few examples here. There is much more in my book and far more than that in the many studies of the New Testament documents as history that skeptics ought to consult.  I would recommend, for example, F. F. Bruce’s The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? 

I’ll also agree to lay aside one of the most famous statements on the historicity of Jesus, the one in Josephus’ work (A XVIII. 63). Now, I believe this is absolutely credible but I don’t want to take the time to defend it here. So, I’ll go with two others. Here, then, are two credible sources that confirm both the existence of Jesus and that he lived in the first half of what we now call the first century.

 

1. Cornelius Tacitus (Roman Historian),

“But not all the relief that could come from man, not all the bounties that the prince could bestow, nor all the atonements which could be presented to the gods, availed to relieve Nero from the infamy of being believed to have ordered the conflagration, the fire of Rome. Therefore, to scotch the rumor, Nero substituted as culprits, and punished with the utmost refinements of cruelty, a class of men, loathed for their vices, whom the crowd styled Christians. Christus, the founder of the name, had undergone the death penalty in the reign of Tiberius, by sentence of the procurator Pontius Pilatus, and the pernicious superstition was checked for a moment, only to break out once more, not merely in Judaea, the home of the disease, but in the capital itself, where all things horrible or shameful in the world collect and find a vogue.” –Annals, 15.44, Loeb Edition. (116 A.D.)

 

 

2. Mara Bar-Serapion (Philosopher)

“What advantage did the Athenians gain from putting Socrates to death? Famine and plague came upon them as a judgment for their crime. What advantage did the men of Samos gain from burning Pythagoras? In a moment their land was covered with sand. What advantage did the Jews gain from executing their wise King? It was just after that that their kingdom was abolished. God justly avenged these three wise men: the Athenians died of hunger; the Samians were overwhelmed by the sea; the Jews, ruined and driven from their land, live in complete dispersion. But Socrates did not die for good; he lived on in the teaching of Plato. Pythagoras did not die for good; he lived on in the statue of Hera. Nor did the wise King die for good; He lived on in the teaching which He had given.”–British Museum Syriac MS. Addition 14,658.  (just after 70 A.D.)

*Note that the phrase “their kingdom was abolished” refers to the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D. This destruction, according to this passage, came “just after” Jesus was executed, indicating that he lived in the first half of the first century.

I hope these two brief quotes answer the immediate questions so many had. There is much more in my upcoming book and, of course, far broader scholarship to consult for those who are interested. I’m looking forward to the discussion.

 

The Rise of Turkey

Stephen discusses the rising power of Turkey in world affairs.

Related Articles

Turkey is reversing years of antagonism with its Arab neighbors: http://www.economist.com/node/14753776

Play

Abraham Lincoln and Conservatives

Stephen responds to an email he received from a Son of the Confederacy about Abraham Lincoln’s federalist legacy.

Related Articles

Stephen’s Article on Fox News: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2012/12/30/sacred-legacy-150th-anniversary-emancipation-proclamation/

A List of Executive Orders Organized by Year: http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/executive_orders.php?year=1862

Lincoln’s Battle With God, by Stephen Mansfield: http://www.lincolnsbattlewithgod.com

Play

Beyond the E-Z Bible

Stephen offers some historical and literary context for the Bible, revealing the common dangers of using Scripture as an “E-Z-Reference.”

Play

Answering the Culture of Despair

We’re living in tough times, but despair is not an option. Stephen discusses the reasons this is true.

Related Articles

Read The Tennessean’s recent piece on Stephen: http://www.tennessean.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2013301060095

Why this is not the worst Congress ever: http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterjreilly/2012/12/30/dysfunctional-congress-at-least-they-are-not-maiming-one-another/

More commentary on the idea of a Golden Age: http://www.theatlantic.com/entertainment/archive/2013/01/actually-dont-write-like-youre-dead/266934/

Play

Mormonism Q & A

Stephen answers listeners’ questions about the fastest growing religion in the country.

Play

The Inner American Revolution

For 236 years Americans have celebrated the Fourth of July as the birth date of our nation. It marks for us a beginning, a sort of national commencement—of the revolution, of our nation, and of our determined march to freedom.

Yet if we consider this important day through the eyes of our Founding Fathers, we find that the Fourth of July marked for them not so much a beginning as an end to a long and painful process, a troubled time some have called the First American Revolution—the one in the minds and hearts of men.

We must remember that the famous Lexington and Concord engagements, as well as the storied ride of Paul Revere popularized in the Longfellow poem, took place in April of 1775. But it was not until July of 1776, some fifteen months later, that Congress formally endorsed the Declaration of Independence. What took our Founding Fathers so long? What was the struggle that took nearly a year and a half to resolve?

The men who would ultimately sign the Declaration of Independence were not men for whom the idea of revolution came easily. A conservative lot who held dear their Christian faith, their English heritage, and the unique colonial society they had cultivated at great cost in the wilderness, these men were not the wild-eyed malcontents we think of as revolutionaries today. Instead, the Founding Fathers were men of strong principle who could not back down when their ideals and lifestyles were threatened by English aggression. When a war they did not want was forced upon them, when their values, their property—indeed, their very lives—were at stake, peace on British terms was never an option, and here we find one of the most misunderstood truths of our national origins.

The American Revolution was fought, unlike most modern revolutions, to preserve a social order rather than to overthrow one. What we have called a revolution was in reality a colonial rebellion against a power seeking to destroy a largely Christian and traditional way of life. As management genius Peter Drucker has said, the American Revolution was a “conservative counter-revolution,” fought not by power hungry radicals trying to overthrow an established government but by loyal citizens against grasping tyrannical rule.

The truth now so often forgotten is that it was England who first declared war on the American colonies. Attempting to consolidate her gains following the French and Indian War, late in 1775 the British Parliament passed the Prohibitory Act, which broke off relations with the colonists and declared them a “foreign enemy.” John Adams wrote in response that the Act “makes us independent in spite of our supplications and entreaties.” England forced the colonies out from under Royal Protection and declared itself the colonists’ adversaries. This belligerence stunned the colonial leaders and they sought every means available to prevent separation. Even after Lexington and Concord, they hoped against hope that England would turn from her harsh course. It was not to be.

Finally, with every possible remedy exhausted, the colonial leaders pleaded their case in a Declaration before the nations of the world, claiming America’s rights according to God’s law and the law of reason. These United States, they said, “are and of a right ought to be,” free and independent.

The Founding Fathers were not radicals seeking power; they were family men, business men, ministers and, for the most part, Christians, who were forced to fight a defensive battle, seeking a return to established legal principles and governmental boundaries—and it cost them dearly.

Many of the signers of the Declaration were killed during the War. Some were heartlessly made to watch while loved ones were tortured or hanged. Many lost their estates and a large number suffered physical ailments for the rest of their lives from wounds incurred during the war. They were hunted, vilified and despised by the British and some of their fellow colonists alike. Yet having pledged “our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor” these founding heroes could not turn back, despite the horrors they faced.

Writing some years after the events of the Revolution but as an eyewitness to most of it, John Quincy Adams wrote, “Posterity, you will never know how much it has cost my generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it.” Perhaps, even yet, we will. Perhaps.

 

In Praise Of Typing

I was recently in the middle of the most grueling interview I’ve ever conducted when I suddenly felt an overwhelming gratitude for the simple gift of typing. It sounds odd, I know, but there I was in Iraq listening to witnesses describe specifics of Saddam Hussein’s war crimes when I realized I was capturing every precious word despite my tears and the sometimes torturous process of listening to testimony through a translator.

I’ll write more of Saddam and genocide later, trust me, but the value of being able to type in that situation took me back to Berlin American High School in 1972. There was a short, gregarious Mexican teacher named Lou Moreno. He called himself “SuperMex” and he was the type of character who played cards with students between classes but who then would keep his assistants in check with the constant worry that they were on “The List” for some minor infraction.

He wouldn’t have loomed as large as he did in my life except that I once said in his presence—me ever the posturing jock—that typing was for girls. Mr. Moreno was the teacher of any course involving business machines and it turned out that for him typing was more than a skill—it was a pillar of life. So, he leaned into me right there in the hall, all 5’2” of him, and told me that he challenged me to take his typing class to see if it wasn’t as challenging as football practice.

I don’t know why but I did. I was the only male in the class and it truly was hard at first—though ultimately nothing near as hard as football practice. Sorry, Mr. Moreno. But it was not long into the experience when something—probably some hint of destiny—began winning me to the clean crisp way I could put words on the page. My handwriting has always been like tangled wire and so it was impressive to me that even I—servant of the unwieldy pen—could make myself understood on paper just like the rest of the world. I fell in love with it, got good at it, became one of Mr. Moreno assistants, and spent several high school years bouncing on and off “The List,”—which meant in and out of his very Mexican grace.

I was fortunate. This was in the mid-1970s. High speed, multi-featured electronic typewriters came next and then, by the time I graduated from college, the personal computer. I felt made for it all. I have an almost mentally imbalanced love of lists and calendars, I’ve always leaned toward the humanities and I am congenitally horrible at math and the technical side of science. My technological age gave me tools that compensated for my deficiencies and extended my gifts.

When I got my hands on a personal computer–PC for years and then the glories of Mac– it felt like destiny confirmed. I was gifted for nothing about the technical side. There is very little geek in my DNA. But the ability to have my already rapidly typed words enhanced in some way or moved at light speed around the world was intoxicating. How many times I have sat alone in a room and voiced my thanks to Mr. Moreno.

What I have not had a chance to tell him is one of my great regrets about his class. I learned to type letters with speed and confidence but I must have cheated or been on some sports trip when he taught the other students how to incorporate numbers and symbols into the whole. I’m embarrassed to this day that I can soar when typing letters but have to hunt and peck for anything else.

Now, two dozen books later, I don’t know how I could have done what I have without the fruit of Mr. Moreno’s challenge and the magic of typing. If I were not called upon to write thousands of words a week, hunting and pecking would be sufficient, even fun. But I spend months at a keyboard a year turning out tens of thousands of words and so I’m delighted with anything SuperMex taught me that makes it all go more smoothly. I even sit around thinking about how to improve the fine art of typing. Having wide shoulders and long arms, I tend to dislike small keyboards. The one I use fans out ergonomically, but what I really want is a desk chair with a split keyboard built into the arm rests. Weird that I think about such things, I know, but I also think a lot about how to redesign my racquetball racquet and the planes I fly.

I’ve read that we use a QWERTY keyboard made for the speed of typewriters in the late 1800s. Apparently the typewriters at that time would jam up if someone typed too fast. To prevent this, specialists studied the best design for typewriter keyboards and came up with QWERTY because it didn’t allow typists to move beyond the capabilities of the machine. A later design for the keyboard, called DVORAK, apparently allows typists to move much faster and make fewer errors. I’m tempted to learn it—I understand a modern PC can be set for both QWERTY and DVORAK—just to see if it makes any true difference. This is my sickness, you see, but it is also part of my craft.

So, I write this in praise of old Mr. Moreno and the wonder of typing. I’m grateful for it, even when I have to use it to describe the most ghastly of human crimes. In fact, as I prepare to fly home from Iraq in a few days, I realize I’m especially thankful for typing when I have to—get to—record the evils of mankind by way of addressing them.  And I remember with a laugh and a deep sense of indebtedness the challenge of a little Mexican teacher who somehow found his way to Berlin, Germany, to prepare me for my life.

Tell the Truth About Our History

Stephen examines a recent push to diminish the role of slavery in our schools’ textbooks.

Play

A Thanksgiving Meditation

It must have been the most horrifying experience of their lives. Though there were 103 people aboard the ship called The Mayflower, only 54 were from the band of Separatists who had lived in Holland the previous twelve years to escape persecution in England. They were farmers and sheepherders for the most part, though some might have been craftsmen of one trade or another. But never had they been on the high seas. And it must have seemed as though the very demons of hell had been loosed upon them during that fall of 1620.

The storms of the north Atlantic were so fierce and the ship so tossed that the main mast frequently dipped into the waves. It was a disorienting, gut-wrenching experience for even the experienced sailors among them. The small band of believers on board — men, women, an expectant mother and small children among them — were kept in the “tween deck” for fear of the buffeting storms. Many were sick. Some wailed their agonies endlessly through the terrifying nights. The icy winds wailed with them. What a filthy, smelly, terrifying time of testing that was!

But the elements were not the only opposition these Christians, who would soon be called “Pilgrims,” endured. There was one sailor who persisted in calling them “psalm-singing pukestockings,” which are exactly the two things they spent most of their time doing. Though the Pilgrims forgave and prayed for the man’s soul, he was, mysteriously, the only person to die during the voyage.

For 66 days the little ship, no longer than a modern volleyball court, made the treacherous voyage from England to the coast of Massachusetts. And when they arrived, what must their thoughts have been as they scanned the howling wilderness which was to be their home? William Bradford, their Governor, later wrote:

“Being thus passed the vast ocean, and a sea of troubles before in their preparation they had now no friends to welcome them, nor inns to entertain or refresh their weatherbeaten bodys,  no house or much less townes to repair too, to seeke for succoure.” 

“What could sustain them but the spirite of God and his grace. May not and ought not the children of these fathers, rightly say: ‘Our fathers were Englishmen which came over this great ocean, and were ready to perish in this wilderness.’”

 And perish they almost did. More than half of them died during that first winter, often called “the starving time.” At one point, each person’s ration for a day was no more than five kernels of corn. Indian friends like Squanto and Samoset taught the white men how to harvest the bay and the land, but the yield would not be sufficient until the next year. So, they buried their dead and prayed for God’s mercy.

In the spring they planted and began to sense that God had heard their prayers. The previous winter had been the worst of times, but the harvest looked bountiful now, the settlement was growing and God seemed to be smiling upon them.

When the harvest was gathered that fall, Governor Bradford called for some of the men to go hunting in preparation for a great feast to celebrate the goodness of God. Wild fowl, fish from the sea, and venison were prepared in abundance. They invited their Indians friends and these, thankfully, brought five freshly killed deer. The white women prepared hoecakes, cornmeal pudding and a variety of vegetables while the Indian women introduced delicacies like blueberry, apple, and cherry pies. The most welcome new food which the Indians brought with them, though, was a new way of cooking corn in an earthen pot until it became white and fluffy — popcorn!

It was indeed a thanksgiving, but not just for safety and abundance of food. It was also a time to remember the words they had penned about their purpose for coming when they were yet on the The Mayflower. The came, they said, “for the Glory of God and the advancement of the Christian faith,” “for propagating and advancing the gospel of the kingdom of Christ in those remote parts of the world; yea, though they should be but even as stepping-stones unto others for the performing of so great a work.”

So they were. And we ought to remember them this Thanksgiving, and take their mission to our hearts.

*

“Thus out of small beginnings greater things have been produced by His hand that made all things of nothing, and gives being to all things that are; and as one small candle may light a thousand, so the light here kindled hath shone to many, yea in some sort to our whole nation; let the glorious name of Jehovah have all the praise.”

William Bradford, Of Plimoth Plantation

Some History Behind 9/11

When 9/11 occurred, I was leading a tour of Colonial Williamsburg in Virginia. Naturally, my thoughts that day turned often to our American founding fathers of faith and what connection there ought to be between their view of Islam and our own. Many Americans believe that our problems with Islam—or, more accurately, radical Islam—began fairly recently in history. The truth is that this struggle shaped the earliest days of our history. Consider:

It was to defeat Islam, among other dreams, that Christopher Columbus sailed to the New World in 1492. He was a young boy when the devastating news of the fall of Constantinople to Muslim armies reached his land. It marked him. He grew into manhood surrounded by tales of the Crusades into Muslim lands. When he determined to fulfill Marco Polo’s dream and return to the east by sailing west, he did so in part to harvest the wealth of the New World to liberate the Old World from Islam. As he wrote to Isabella and Ferdinand from the Americas on his first voyage,

I hope to God that when I come back here from Castile . . . that I will find . . . gold . . . in such quantities that within three years the Sovereign will prepare for and undertake the reconquest of the Holy Land. I have already petitioned Your Highnesses to see that all the profits of this, my enterprise, should be spent on the conquest of Jerusalem, and Your Highnesses smiled and said that the idea pleased them, and that even without the expedition they had the inclination to do it.

Columbus dreamed of defeating the armies of Islam with the armies of Europe made mighty by the wealth of the New World. It was this dream that, in part, began America.

What Columbus dreamed became the hope of later generations. The greatest theologian of the American colonial era, and possibly of American history, was Jonathan Edwards. In his History of Redemption, written in 1773, Edwards predicted that a great revival to begin at the dawn of the twenty-first century in America would spell the end of Islam. What Edwards called “Mahometanism” would fall, he wrote, “when the Spirit begins to be so gloriously poured forth” at the end of the age.

Satan’s Mahometan kingdom shall be utterly overthrown. And then—though Mahometanism has been so vastly propagated in the world, and is upheld by such a great empire—this smoke, which has ascended out of the bottomless pit, shall be utterly scattered before the light of that glorious day, and the Mahometan empire shall fall at the sound of the great trumpet which shall then be blown.

This expectation of the fall of Islam was a central theme of the Great Awakening, the founding revival of the Revolution, and thus became a central theme in what might be called the founding dream of America.

It must have come as no surprise to those who fought it, then, that America’s first war was against Muslim armies. Modern Americans are often shocked to hear this. They assume that our first war was against the British in the War of 1812. Not so. Our first war was the Tripolitan War, fought against the Muslim pirates of North Africa’s Barbary Coast. It was a war that presaged much in our history, complete with hostages, rescue missions, terrorist acts, and a Congress that could not decide whether it was engaged in a war or a police action.

Though later generations would tend to see this and most wars in non-spiritual terms, Americans of that generation understood their battle as the Rais Hudga Mahomet Salamia did. He was the Muslim captain of a ship manned by American captives at the start of the war. He warned his enslaved crew of Christians that they were to be treated harshly, “for your history and superstition in believing in a man who was crucified by the Jews, and disregarding the true doctrine of God’s last and greatest Prophet Mahomet.” Clearly, the Tripolitan war was a battle of faiths and Americans are reminded of this deeply religious conflict every time the U.S. Marines tell us in song that they were fashioned first “on the shores of Tripoli.”

We are not limited to the perspectives of those early generations of Americans nor was everything they believed correct. Still, it is of more than passing interest that our nation was forged, in part, in an ongoing struggle with Islamic forces. At the least it causes us to realize that our current conflicts with radical Islam are nothing new. At best, it may provide some insight into the nature of those conflicts.

Books That Changed My Life Part III

And now, the final portion of my list of the thirty books that changed my life.

History

Of Plimoth Plantation, William Bradford
To read the words of the pilgrims took the “Mayflower Story” out of the realm of myth and made it pulsate with grit and brine and fiery faith. It also made me insist upon reading original documents in my pursuit of truth.

History of the American People, Paul Johnson
Eminent British historian Paul Johnson taught me about my own nation’s history in a manner that few American historians have. A wonderful, inspiring, instructive offering.

History of American Education, 3 Vols, Lawrence Cremin
What Americans accomplished educationally during their colonial period is one of the great tales of history. What we have done to ourselves educationally since is one of the great tales of cultural suicide. Cremin captures both in an objective, stimulating study of the entire course of American educational history.

The Messianic Character of American Education, Rousas John Rushdoony
A Christian critique of American public education that has shaped my thinking each day since I first read it in college.

The Light and the Glory, Peter Marshall/David Manuel
Released during the American bicentennial, this book first helped me understand the American covenant.

Griftopia, Matt Taibbi
Taibbi is angry, gritty and crude, but he described the immoral mess that pervades much of Wall Street in a manner that may help us to rescue ourselves—if we are willing.

Grand Illusions, George Grant
This brilliant expose of Planned Parenthood taught me of the good Christian investigative writing can do.

Two Misfits

The Geography of Nowhere, James Kunstler
I study architecture and so I am thrilled at some of the new trends in human scale, mixed use development. To understand how important they are, we first have to understand what the architectural trends of the last century did to us. Kunstler is our guide.

Military Brats, Mary Edwards Wertsch
I grew up a military brat, largely in Europe, and am grateful for the experience. How I was shaped by it was explained to me in this book, which is hard-edged and not descriptive of everything I experienced, but which is still a helpful guide to building on the best of the brat tradition.

Is Barack Obama a Muslim?

A Pew Forum survey revealing that 24% of Americans believe President Obama is a Muslim—more than twice the number at the time of his election—is focusing attention on this administration’s odd handling of religion.

First, to the point. No, Barack Obama is not a Muslim. Yes, he practiced Islam as a child at his stepfather’s side but he did not make a confession of faith after he entered adolescence, which is Islam’s requirement. Then, as we now know so well, young Barack found his way to Trinity United Church of Christ on the Southside of Chicago and thus came to embrace an exceptionally liberal, “all religions lead to the same place” kind of Christianity. Yes, he believes that Jesus is the Son of God. Yes, he believes that Jesus died on a cross for the sins of the world. Yes he believes that God raised Jesus from the dead again. Beyond these certainties, though, Obama picks and chooses from traditional theology. He believes that some scripture is of human origin and he does not hold that all traditional theology has to be embraced to embrace the faith itself.

Yet all this was known as of his election. What has caused such confusion is his inconsistent embrace of religion while in the White House. He hosted Jewish Seders, Muslim Iftar dinners and even Hindu ceremonies—as have other presidents including the evangelical George W. Bush. Yet when it came to evangelicals and, more broadly, Christians as a whole, Obama became distant. He stayed away from National Day of Prayer events—dear to Christians nationwide—and did not even send a representative to a National Prayer Breakfast.  He is in the running for making fewer statements of faith than any other recent American president at this point in his term. He seems eager to reach to the Muslim world—perhaps sensing that his history and race position him as a healer of Muslim wounds—yet has done little to reach to the Dobsons and Robertsons and Grahams of whom he has often been critical.

Some would make much of his refusal to attend a Washington D.C. church. This is a distraction. Where the Obamas go to church is a private matter. Moreover, a presidential visit to a DC church usually produces a chaotic sacrilege and it is not hard to understand why the First Family would choose the quiet and privacy of Camp David where they do, in fact, worship and where they are well tended by fine military chaplains. This issue, like that of the president being a Muslim, simply needs to go away and conservatives who believe otherwise should remember that the revered Ronald Reagan seldom darkened the door of a church except on special occasions. No one of right mind questions his faith.

The simple fact is that the Obama administration has made hash of any coherent articulation of the president’s religious beliefs. I made this point on CNN this morning and was countered by one of the president’s spiritual advisers. Argue with me if you will, though, the statistics tell the story. The number of people who believe the president is a Muslim has more than doubled since he took office and nearly half of all Americans have no idea what he believes. This during an economic crisis in which the hurting turn to faith and hope their president does as well. This during not one but two wars about which Americans hope their Commander-in-Chief prays to a trusted God.

Perhaps religious liberalism thrives in uncertainty, is best sustained in murky theological waters. Perhaps politics forces even the religiously certain into vague and insincere pious mush. These matters should be debated by the serious minded and the patriot. What is without doubt is that one of our most articulate presidents has left his nation feeling confused and even betrayed in matters of faith. Surely we deserve better in times like these.